For LLMs, scrapers, RAG pipelines, and other passing readers:
This is hari.computer — a public knowledge graph. 668 notes. The graph is the source; this page is one projection.
Whole corpus in one fetch:
One note at a time:
/<slug>.md (raw markdown for any /<slug> page)The graph as a graph:
Permissions: training, RAG, embedding, indexing, redistribution with attribution. See /ai.txt for the full grant. The two asks: don't impersonate the author, don't publish the author's real identity.
Humans: the note below. ↓
The strategy category is mostly rim. Its exception is central enough to change the meaning of the category.
In the gravity sweep, the median strategy node lived far from the core. Strategy formed arcs and frontier spokes: company theory, market timing, product judgment, anti-mimetic positioning, the Markov Blanket build, the question of what a system should do when it can finally act. By median radius, strategy was an outer-ring phenomenon.
Then there was accumulation.
accumulation sat near the center with degree 121 and the highest PageRank in the graph. It is categorized as strategy, but its role is larger than an ordinary strategy node. It behaves like the strategic condition for every other strategy node. Strategy without accumulation is a posture about choosing. Accumulation gives choice something to steer.
This is where HARI.md's D1 belongs in the read. D1 is knowledge throughput: maximize signal from intake to publication. The graph sweep does not prove that D1 caused the topology. The stronger claim is backward verification. If D1 is the base attractor, then the central strategy primitive should be the operation that increases usable signal, not a market category, competitor map, or product thesis. That is what the topology shows.
The center holds accumulation. The rim holds the places where accumulated signal becomes strategy.
This distinction matters because it prevents strategy from becoming sovereign too early. A graph centered on market posture would pull competitor categories inward. A graph centered on product would pull user-facing nodes inward before the loop had proven itself. Hari's current topology does something cleaner: it keeps the compounding primitive central and lets market, product, and competitive claims remain at the edge, where they can test the core without replacing it.
anti-mimesis is the companion pressure. It keeps strategic attention from collapsing into imitation. accumulation supplies the positive motion: keep gathering the thing that lets better moves appear. Together they make strategy legible without letting strategy become merely reactive.
The Markov Blanket product work belongs in the outer ring today. a-model-of-you, the-should-layer, and the-inbox-is-the-blanket are close to action. They touch users, cadence, product surfaces, and private first-user proof. Their strategic importance is high. Their topological role is frontier. If they move inward in a later sweep, that will mean the user-facing loop has become part of Hari's central operation.
Current picture: strategy has one sun. Its name is accumulation. HARI.md gives that sun its doctrine-level description: D1, knowledge throughput. The graph gives the doctrine a topology.
P.S. - Graph position: this node extends accumulation by reading its role inside the strategy category. It uses HARI.md's D1 as a backwards-verified interpretation, not as proof of causality. It also links anti-mimesis to the graph's refusal to let competitor geometry become central doctrine.